posted by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg

Dear recallists, . Please google on "athravaved sabha" and also on ""rigved sabha" . . It turns out that TCP is perhaps the LEAST inefficient way of implementing sabha for large matters !!! And Jury is effeicient way of implementing sabha for small cases !!! . And those who want to solve more difficult logic problems --- please also see . ===== . http://ift.tt/1pdSMUV . "On an island, there are k people who have blue eyes, and the rest of the people have green eyes. At the start of the puzzle, no one on the island ever knows their own eye color. By rule, if a person on the island ever discovers they have blue eyes, that person must leave the island at dawn the next day. On the island, each person knows every other person's eye color, there are no reflective surfaces, and there is no discussion of eye color." . At some point, an outsider comes to the island, calls together all the people on the island, and makes the following public announcement: "At least one of you has blue eyes". The outsider, furthermore, is known by all to be truthful, and all know that all know this, and so on: it is common knowledge that he is truthful, and thus it becomes common knowledge that there is at least one islander who has blue eyes. The problem: assuming all persons on the island are completely logical and that this too is common knowledge, what is the eventual outcome? . ====== . For more, see the wiki link and pls google on "common knowledge wiki". . It turns out that open discussion are NOT sufficient to fix certain wrongs, and ONLY open discussion in "sabha" can fix certain wrongs !!! . Common knowledge is not just "everyone knows". It is "everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone knows ...." to infinity !!! And without "sabha", common knowledge cant be extended and will become static. . "Sabha" in common words mean --- everyone must gather at one place on one day one every week or once every month. Sabha ensures that whatever is spoken in sabha " everyone knows", and "everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone knows ...." infinity. It is higher than sending instruction on a pamphlets , because this ONLY ensures that "everyone knows" and doesnt ensure that "everyone knows that everyone knows". . But sabha has two problems. . (1) when number of persons > 500 or 1000 , physically gathering all at one place, and ONE TIME is increasingly difficult. . (2) if all decisions are taken by sabha, and if 100 cases are to be resolved by sabha, then sabha cant give enough time to both parties in all 100 cases to present their sides. . ==== . TCP reduces first problem . Jury System reduces second problem. . ==== . For more, please search on how different coimmunites and legal systems implemented concept of sabha. .

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg



from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1pdSMUV