posted by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg

To decide the motives of a politician, activists or journalist or ANYONE , look at the issues on which he demands and practices silence , more than what he talks about. . Often , the loud voice on some topic is only to suppress the voices on topics that make them uncomfortable. . eg1. SoMoKe and SoMoKe-andhbhagats always insist on pindrop silence on whether mineral royalties should be directly deposited into citizens' accounts or not !! And their loud talks supporting FDI is ONLY to suppress this mineral royalty distribution topic. . eg2. Those who support BBC-documentary want pin drop silence on the topic of whether the juvenile murderer should be hanged or not. Their LOUDLY worshipping BBC-documentary as it it is some scripture , is only to to ensure that the proposal to hang the juvenile criminal doesnt become well know. . And you will see countless examples.

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg



from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1FxWn7A

Popular posts from this blog

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 09:49AM

Why SoMoKe / CoBhAp oppose publicizing ALL land-ownership records in Delhi? . One of the Right to Recall Group proposal which gives hypothermia to SoMoKe in Rajathsni sumer and makes them sweat in Kashmiri winter is ---- put the names of ALL land-owners and flat owners on net along with their holdings' details. And if a plot is owned by company / trust then put the names of the owners and trustees on net as well. . The proposal is widely supported by almost all committed members of CoBhAp . But most CoBhAp members still oppose it when asked. Why? . First lets see why SoMoKe oppose this proposal. Sonia Gandhi owns land worth over Rs 5000 crore in via charitable trusts in Delhi alone !!! And multiply by 10 or 15 for all India estimate. She has lot to lose if this information becomes public. So she opposed this RRG proposal. . But does NaMo oppose this proposal? NaMo doesnt have any such land. In fact, NaMo has no trust, no company and only land he owns is 1-2 homes that he bought wit...
Read more

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at December 30, 2014 at 06:24PM

How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite . Consider 10000 super-elitemen wealthiest individuals. The most effective force which forced these 1000 individuals to keep the products of their oligopolies low is the competition which comes from next 50000 sub-superelitemen !!! The inheritance tax these 50000 inidividuals and creates minimal loss to top 10000 !! Which is why (wealth tax minus income tax paid minus 15% of salaries paid is better minus other credits) is better alternative than inheritance tax !!! . Now I would request ALL recallists to explain (or oppose) "How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite" . I will write more tomorrow by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg from Right to Recall Group https://www.facebook.com/56633688102/posts/10152979170563103 via Bhavik Barai
Read more