by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta at November 03, 2014 at 09:42AM

Getting law-drafts to reduce 50 problems such as corruption or gohatya or bangladeshi or reduce inefficiencies of factory owners or fix taxation; and spreading information about these law-drafts . . For all activists, I say we require 50 versions of mini-301.pdf !!! And this booklet at fb . com/groups/righttorecallparty/10152747542153103/ (see link in comment) is the first such version !!! . Why do we need 50 version of mini-301.pdf? . Because true activists aka non-80G-activists happen to be in 50 different state of mind. . One set wants to solve goraksha problem FIRST and other problems later. Second set wants to solve corruption problem first and other problems later. The third set wants to solve factory owners problems first and all problems later. The fifth set wants to solve Bangladeshi problem first and everything else later. And so on. . With all flaws in them, these activists are better than rest 98% of population who dont want to spend any time on any cause. . So IMO, we need to write 50 booklets. IMO, we need to write one booklet for each set of activist. The booklet should explain how RTR over which key persons reduces his specific problems. How Jury System reduces his specific problems. How applicable economic law, be subsidy allocation or taxation, reduces his specific problem. All topics of 301.pdf will not apply -- some 10% will. Some 5% such as RTR, JutySys, TCP etc will apply on almost all problems . Each booklet should explain how RTR, JurySys, TCP, MRCM etc law-drafts solve his SPECIFIC problem and not talk about other problems. . And finally the booklet MUST have full text of SMS with URL links (and torrent links in future) , which activists can send as order to MP via SMS. . So each set of activists will read 1-2 booklets, see how HIS SPECIFIC problems reduce via RTR, TCP, JurySys, economic allocation laws , tax laws, And then some may read whole 301.pdf later. Basically, each booklet needs one or more complete modules. Each module is . a) law-draft text . b) url to fb-status where law-draft is posted . or better , magnet torrent link to law-draft . c) the text of sms to containing url or magnet torrent link . d) basic instructions to activists on giving newspaper avt of draft, sms etc. . The goraksha booklet explains this in detail. Here, many law-drafts are stated from gorakshak's PoV and makes no attempt to drag him to towards activism on anything else. . I request all recallist to read goraksha booklet from Right to recall Group files section, and write 50 more such booklet. One booklet for each problem.

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta



from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1Gd5tbN

via Bhavik Barai

Popular posts from this blog

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 09:49AM

Why SoMoKe / CoBhAp oppose publicizing ALL land-ownership records in Delhi? . One of the Right to Recall Group proposal which gives hypothermia to SoMoKe in Rajathsni sumer and makes them sweat in Kashmiri winter is ---- put the names of ALL land-owners and flat owners on net along with their holdings' details. And if a plot is owned by company / trust then put the names of the owners and trustees on net as well. . The proposal is widely supported by almost all committed members of CoBhAp . But most CoBhAp members still oppose it when asked. Why? . First lets see why SoMoKe oppose this proposal. Sonia Gandhi owns land worth over Rs 5000 crore in via charitable trusts in Delhi alone !!! And multiply by 10 or 15 for all India estimate. She has lot to lose if this information becomes public. So she opposed this RRG proposal. . But does NaMo oppose this proposal? NaMo doesnt have any such land. In fact, NaMo has no trust, no company and only land he owns is 1-2 homes that he bought wit...
Read more

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at December 30, 2014 at 06:24PM

How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite . Consider 10000 super-elitemen wealthiest individuals. The most effective force which forced these 1000 individuals to keep the products of their oligopolies low is the competition which comes from next 50000 sub-superelitemen !!! The inheritance tax these 50000 inidividuals and creates minimal loss to top 10000 !! Which is why (wealth tax minus income tax paid minus 15% of salaries paid is better minus other credits) is better alternative than inheritance tax !!! . Now I would request ALL recallists to explain (or oppose) "How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite" . I will write more tomorrow by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg from Right to Recall Group https://www.facebook.com/56633688102/posts/10152979170563103 via Bhavik Barai
Read more