by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta at November 01, 2014 at 08:03AM

We should have narcotest in public, and Jury Trial on key accused of 1984 Delhi anti-sikh riots. . Please note that SoMoke , CoBhAp have opposed narcotest in public on key riot accused of 1984 delhi riots. . How do we generate whole campaign? I suggest following steps . 1. Pls see the links to law-drafts and "order your MP via SMS" campaign , I have proposed in tinyurl .com/RahulMehtaSMS . . 2. Please prepare a similar draft for narcotest in public by Jury over 1984 riot accused, . 3. Request voters to send orders to MPs via SMS to print that draft in Gazette. . ===== . SoMoKe = Sonia, NaMo, AK have opposed the proposal to narcotest 1984 riot accused in public, Proof : ask them. And their andhbhagats are opposing the narcotest in public , because if they support narcotest in public then it will weaken the image of their tall leaders. . We can and must use this fact to inform all activists and voters than SoMoKe-andbhagats are committed to their tall leaders, and not justice. And their tall leaders are scared of committing to justice.

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta



from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1qc2NRv

via Bhavik Barai

Popular posts from this blog

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 09:49AM

Why SoMoKe / CoBhAp oppose publicizing ALL land-ownership records in Delhi? . One of the Right to Recall Group proposal which gives hypothermia to SoMoKe in Rajathsni sumer and makes them sweat in Kashmiri winter is ---- put the names of ALL land-owners and flat owners on net along with their holdings' details. And if a plot is owned by company / trust then put the names of the owners and trustees on net as well. . The proposal is widely supported by almost all committed members of CoBhAp . But most CoBhAp members still oppose it when asked. Why? . First lets see why SoMoKe oppose this proposal. Sonia Gandhi owns land worth over Rs 5000 crore in via charitable trusts in Delhi alone !!! And multiply by 10 or 15 for all India estimate. She has lot to lose if this information becomes public. So she opposed this RRG proposal. . But does NaMo oppose this proposal? NaMo doesnt have any such land. In fact, NaMo has no trust, no company and only land he owns is 1-2 homes that he bought wit...
Read more

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at December 30, 2014 at 06:24PM

How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite . Consider 10000 super-elitemen wealthiest individuals. The most effective force which forced these 1000 individuals to keep the products of their oligopolies low is the competition which comes from next 50000 sub-superelitemen !!! The inheritance tax these 50000 inidividuals and creates minimal loss to top 10000 !! Which is why (wealth tax minus income tax paid minus 15% of salaries paid is better minus other credits) is better alternative than inheritance tax !!! . Now I would request ALL recallists to explain (or oppose) "How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite" . I will write more tomorrow by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg from Right to Recall Group https://www.facebook.com/56633688102/posts/10152979170563103 via Bhavik Barai
Read more