by Chandra Kumar Bose at November 04, 2014 at 11:30AM

http://ift.tt/1DXXbRl

by Chandra Kumar Bose



from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1DXXbRl

via Bhavik Barai

Popular posts from this blog

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 10:58AM

Why are Sakshi Maharaj ,Yogi Adityanath and ALL BJP-MPs opposing referendum / voting on 2-child-law-draft? Why do BJP-MPs oppose disclosure of census-2011 religion data? . In order to hide the FACT that BJP-MPs dont want to print 2 child law-draft, BJP-apex ordered Sakshi Maharaj to make nonsensical statements like "Hindu women should have 4 kids". And what we need is 2-child-law draft (3 for tribals, and an extra child for those who have 2 daughters). We dont need nonsense like 4 kids and 5 kids. . ======= . We all ignored population / demographic problem till 1980. It was Devi Indira Amma who first focused on this problem in 1975, but sadly, Sanjay Gundaa ruined it due to whimsical ham handed forceful vasectomies. In 1980 , the focus on problem came back. . But due to Saudi Arabian bribes, Congress-MPs opposed 2 child law-draft. But the question is --- why have BJP-MPs too been opposing 2 child-law draft since 1980? Why didnt BJP MPs ever demanded referendum on 2-child law-...
Read more

posted by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg

Election commission's decision to put pictures of candidates will only increase number of spurious candidates in election and is a wrong one. Solution is to add father's name or husband's name and age , along with the name of candidate for "disambiguation". . Also election commission should advertise the fact that NATIONAL parties and STATE parties come in top band and in second band, and independents come in third band. This will reduce the possibility of independents with same name fooling voters. . Many people want fame for sake of it. And if Rs 25000 can tame his picture to 15 lakh voters, then Rs 25000 is worth for them. IOW, number of spurious independents will increase election commission puts picture of candidate on voting machine. . by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1FwG8J2
Read more

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 09:49AM

Why SoMoKe / CoBhAp oppose publicizing ALL land-ownership records in Delhi? . One of the Right to Recall Group proposal which gives hypothermia to SoMoKe in Rajathsni sumer and makes them sweat in Kashmiri winter is ---- put the names of ALL land-owners and flat owners on net along with their holdings' details. And if a plot is owned by company / trust then put the names of the owners and trustees on net as well. . The proposal is widely supported by almost all committed members of CoBhAp . But most CoBhAp members still oppose it when asked. Why? . First lets see why SoMoKe oppose this proposal. Sonia Gandhi owns land worth over Rs 5000 crore in via charitable trusts in Delhi alone !!! And multiply by 10 or 15 for all India estimate. She has lot to lose if this information becomes public. So she opposed this RRG proposal. . But does NaMo oppose this proposal? NaMo doesnt have any such land. In fact, NaMo has no trust, no company and only land he owns is 1-2 homes that he bought wit...
Read more