by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta at November 06, 2014 at 08:26AM

Those who want to know the truth will start searching for truth and not ask for "proof". So dont waste time with people who say "do you have proofs?". . Many times, I write posts giving SoMoKe's actions on many laws that are being passed in India or not passed in India. eg I once said that "SoMoKe oppose Citizens' review over judiciary as practiced in USA, Japana and Jury System as practiced in USA,". And each time , I make such sentences, their andhbhagats run and ask me "give me a proof". Well, I just request them not to waste their time on my wall. I and I request all recallists , to ask all this proof-seekers not to waste time to walls on recallists. Trust me, these proof-seekers are useless people and will never be useful in our goal of getting law-drafts like MRCM, JurySys, RTR, TCP etc. . Because those who want to know truth would never ask useless questions like "give me proof that SoMoKe oppose Citizens' review over judiciary as practiced in USA, Japana and Jury System as practiced in USA," . Why? . Because if he wanted to know truth, he would take following steps . 1. He would have GOOGLED on what is citizen's review over judiciary, japan, USA etc keywords and found it . 2. He would read the constitutional amendment NaMo printed wrt judiciary some 2 months ago. . 3. He would have obtained private member's bills congress, app MPs proposed wrt judiciary. . 4. He would have tried to see if that constitutional amendment or those private member's bills have citizens' review over Judiciary or Jury System. . 5. And then decided on his own whether statement that "SoMoKe oppose Citizens' review over judiciary as practiced in USA, Japan and Jury System as practiced in USA," is true or false all by himself. . But instead of spending time in googling and reading the constitutional amendments and private members' bills, they jump and say "give me the proof that ....". Well, I ask them to further save their time by staying away from my wall !! . AFAIS , I didnt lose anything by losing them. My goal is to take some pieces of INFORMATION to all 82 crore adult voters and other 20 crore non-voters who are abiove the age of 10 years. What pieces of information? . (1) that "there are countries like USA on our planet which have law-drafts like JurySys , RTR , wealth tax, referendum etc and they are ahead of us due to these law-drafts". . (2) least expensive way and least time consuming way to get these law-drafts printed in Indian Gazette is to make over 42 crore voters order MPs via SMS with URL or better URN to these law-drafts . The proof seekers arent going to be useful in step-1 and step-2 anyway. So IMO, I didnt lose anything by losing them. . So next time if anyone asks for proofs, pls ask him to decide on his own, and then not waste time on your walls.

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta



from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/10pH9T4

via Bhavik Barai

Popular posts from this blog

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 09:49AM

Why SoMoKe / CoBhAp oppose publicizing ALL land-ownership records in Delhi? . One of the Right to Recall Group proposal which gives hypothermia to SoMoKe in Rajathsni sumer and makes them sweat in Kashmiri winter is ---- put the names of ALL land-owners and flat owners on net along with their holdings' details. And if a plot is owned by company / trust then put the names of the owners and trustees on net as well. . The proposal is widely supported by almost all committed members of CoBhAp . But most CoBhAp members still oppose it when asked. Why? . First lets see why SoMoKe oppose this proposal. Sonia Gandhi owns land worth over Rs 5000 crore in via charitable trusts in Delhi alone !!! And multiply by 10 or 15 for all India estimate. She has lot to lose if this information becomes public. So she opposed this RRG proposal. . But does NaMo oppose this proposal? NaMo doesnt have any such land. In fact, NaMo has no trust, no company and only land he owns is 1-2 homes that he bought wit...
Read more

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at December 30, 2014 at 06:24PM

How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite . Consider 10000 super-elitemen wealthiest individuals. The most effective force which forced these 1000 individuals to keep the products of their oligopolies low is the competition which comes from next 50000 sub-superelitemen !!! The inheritance tax these 50000 inidividuals and creates minimal loss to top 10000 !! Which is why (wealth tax minus income tax paid minus 15% of salaries paid is better minus other credits) is better alternative than inheritance tax !!! . Now I would request ALL recallists to explain (or oppose) "How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite" . I will write more tomorrow by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg from Right to Recall Group https://www.facebook.com/56633688102/posts/10152979170563103 via Bhavik Barai
Read more