by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at February 13, 2015 at 09:44AM

Using heads to understand law-drafts vs use head to wear caps !!! . A key difference between Right to Recall Group and CoBhApSwaRa = ( Congress + BJP + AAP +BST + RSS + VHP ) is that . RRG asks volunteers to use heads to read law-drafts and se how law-drafts can reduce the problems of India such as MNC-domination, Missionaries, poverty, corruption, inefficiencies in factories etc . Where as CoBhApSwaRa = ( Congress + BJP + AAP +BST + RSS + VHP ) want volunteers to use head ONLY to wear caps. . RRG asks volunteers to use ears to listen question on law-drafts, use heads to make answers and use toungues to explain the answers. Where as CoBhApSwaRa = ( Congress + BJP + AAP +BST + RSS + VHP ) asks volunteers to use ears ONLY to listen to leaders , use head to wear caps, and use toungues ONLY to shout slogans !! . RRG volunteer cant be replaced by a robot. whereas as CoBhaApSwaRa-volunteer can be replaced a slogan-shouting robot which looks like human. The robot can download the latest mp3 slogan file, and have a mike in throat and can play the mp3 slogan file !!! The robots would only need a small AI javasacript to synchronize. The robot can also work as a listener when tall leader gives the speech. And IMO, such robo will be cheaper !! I wonder why their leaders want human volunteers when a robo which would cost far less can do their jobs more efficiently !! Can you guess the reasons? . .

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg



from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1AhuS3V

via Bhavik Barai

Popular posts from this blog

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 09:49AM

Why SoMoKe / CoBhAp oppose publicizing ALL land-ownership records in Delhi? . One of the Right to Recall Group proposal which gives hypothermia to SoMoKe in Rajathsni sumer and makes them sweat in Kashmiri winter is ---- put the names of ALL land-owners and flat owners on net along with their holdings' details. And if a plot is owned by company / trust then put the names of the owners and trustees on net as well. . The proposal is widely supported by almost all committed members of CoBhAp . But most CoBhAp members still oppose it when asked. Why? . First lets see why SoMoKe oppose this proposal. Sonia Gandhi owns land worth over Rs 5000 crore in via charitable trusts in Delhi alone !!! And multiply by 10 or 15 for all India estimate. She has lot to lose if this information becomes public. So she opposed this RRG proposal. . But does NaMo oppose this proposal? NaMo doesnt have any such land. In fact, NaMo has no trust, no company and only land he owns is 1-2 homes that he bought wit...
Read more

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at December 30, 2014 at 06:24PM

How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite . Consider 10000 super-elitemen wealthiest individuals. The most effective force which forced these 1000 individuals to keep the products of their oligopolies low is the competition which comes from next 50000 sub-superelitemen !!! The inheritance tax these 50000 inidividuals and creates minimal loss to top 10000 !! Which is why (wealth tax minus income tax paid minus 15% of salaries paid is better minus other credits) is better alternative than inheritance tax !!! . Now I would request ALL recallists to explain (or oppose) "How inheritance tax benefits super-elite by taxing sub-superelite and reducing competitive edge of sub-elite" . I will write more tomorrow by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg from Right to Recall Group https://www.facebook.com/56633688102/posts/10152979170563103 via Bhavik Barai
Read more