posted by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg

Airtel / Vodafone can get 5 crore GENUINE signatures and SMS in favor of net partiality with no fraud. IOW,10 lakh emails to TRAI on net neutrality has zero political value . . Airtel Zero plan offered by Airtel violates net neutrality. Because it allows Airtel customers to access WhatApp , FB.com etc for free and to access other websites, the customers need to pay. . Now Airtel can get GENUINE signatures from Airtel Zero users to suport Net Partiality. And Airtel can also convince the users to send all 100% genuine SMS to TRAI to continue net partiality !! And all these SMS / signatures will be real --- no force or fraud.. . IOW, 10 lakh email signatures in favor net neutarlity has NO political value . Net neutrality is expensive. It requires a serious legal \ economic structure to keep it so. I have proposed legal / economic structure to SUSTAIN net neutrality in my previous post --- http://ift.tt/1GdpbGL
by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg

from Right to Recall Group http://ift.tt/1GdpbGL

Popular posts from this blog

by Rahul Chimanbhai Mehta Rrg at January 14, 2015 at 09:49AM

Why SoMoKe / CoBhAp oppose publicizing ALL land-ownership records in Delhi? . One of the Right to Recall Group proposal which gives hypothermia to SoMoKe in Rajathsni sumer and makes them sweat in Kashmiri winter is ---- put the names of ALL land-owners and flat owners on net along with their holdings' details. And if a plot is owned by company / trust then put the names of the owners and trustees on net as well. . The proposal is widely supported by almost all committed members of CoBhAp . But most CoBhAp members still oppose it when asked. Why? . First lets see why SoMoKe oppose this proposal. Sonia Gandhi owns land worth over Rs 5000 crore in via charitable trusts in Delhi alone !!! And multiply by 10 or 15 for all India estimate. She has lot to lose if this information becomes public. So she opposed this RRG proposal. . But does NaMo oppose this proposal? NaMo doesnt have any such land. In fact, NaMo has no trust, no company and only land he owns is 1-2 homes that he bought wit...
Read more